Neurodiversity and disability
a theoretical and critical reflection
Abstract
Introduction: The article addresses the complexity and controversies surrounding the concept of neurodiversity and disability in the field of mental health.
Objective: To critically explore the current landscape of neurodiversity, addressing the various interpretations and applications of this concept.
Development: It is noted that the lack of clarity in its definition has generated polarized debates about its utility and validity. Some argue that the neurodiversity approach solely blames society, while others acknowledge the influence of both social and individual factors. Additionally, the breadth of this concept and its implications for diagnostic categories in neurology and psychiatry are discussed.
Conclusions: The article proposes a critical reflection and a review of the social model of disability as a theoretical tool to validate the concept of neurodiversity and its practical application in mental health research and intervention.
References
Abberley, P. (1998). Trabajo, utopía y deficiencia. En L. Barton (Comp.). Discapacidad y Sociedad. Morata.
Baker, D. L. (2011). The politics of neurodiversity: why public policy matters. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Barnes, E. (2016). The minority body: a theory of disability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732587.001.0001.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Editorial perspective: neurodiversity - a revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 744-747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12703.
Berger, R. y Wilbers, L. (2021). Introducing disability studies. 2ª ed. Lynne Rienner.
Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnqn9.
Cruz, M. (2020). La relación entre la discapacidad intelectual, la inteligencia y la eugenesia en la América del siglo XX. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 8(1), 261-271.
den Houting, J. (2019). Neurodiversity: an insider’s perspective. Autism, 23(2), 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318820762.
Doyle, N. (2017). Neurodiversity at work. En BPS (Ed.), Psychology at work: improving wellbeing and productivity in the workplace (pp. 44-62). British Psychological Society.
Dwyer, P. (2022). The neurodiversity approach(es): what are they and what do they mean for researchers? Human Development, 66(2), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000523723.
Evers, D. (2017). Neurodiversity, normality, and theological anthropology. Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences, 4(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.1628/ptsc-2017-0004.
Fenton, A. y Krahn, T. (2007). Autism, neurodiversity and equality beyond the ‘normal’. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 2(2), 1-6.
Figari, C. A. y Fernández Unsain, R. A. (2023). Re-presentaciones sociales de la discapacidad: entre modelos y personas. Debates y perspectivas en la dinámica de las interacciones sociales. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 11(2), 7-28.
French, L. y Kennedy, E. M. M. (2018). Annual research review: early intervention for infants and young children with, or at-risk of, autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 444-456.
Griffin, E. y Pollak, D. (2009). Student experiences of neurodiversity in higher education: insights from the BRAINHE Project. Dyslexia, 15, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.383.
Guevara, A. (2021). The need to reimagine disability rights law because the medical model of disability fails us all. Wisconsin Law Review, (269).
Hart, A. (2020). A new alliance? The hearing voices movement and neurodiversity. En H. Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, N. Chown y A. Stenning (Eds.), Neurodiversity studies: a new critical paradigm (pp. 221-225). Routledge.
Jaarsma, P. y Welin, S. (2012). Autism as a natural human variation: reflections on the claims of the neurodiversity movement. Health Care Analysis, 20(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9.
Jumah, F., Ghannam, M., Jaber, M., Adeeb, N. y Tubbs, R. S. (2016). Neuroanatomical variation in autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review. Clinical Anatomy, 29, 454-465.
Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E. y Hutman, T. (2012). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353.
Krcek, T. E. (2012). Deconstructing disability and neurodiversity: controversial issues for autism and implications for social work. Journal of Progress in Human Services, 24, 4-22.
Lang, R. (2007). The development and critique of the social model of disability. Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre, UCL.
Linehan, T. B. (2014). Neurodiversity and disability: an analysis of social movement framing in dialog between parents and autistic self-advocates. Theses & Dissertations, 130. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228586357.pdf.
Míguez, M. (2012). Discapacidad en lo social. Un enfoque desde las corporalidades. En M. Almeida y M. Angelino (Eds.), Debates y perspectivas en torno a la discapacidad en América Latina. UNER.
de Moura Evêncio, K. M. y Pimentel Fernandes, G. (2019). História do autismo: compreensões iniciais. Revista Multidisciplinar e de Psicologia, 13(47), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v13i47.1968.
Ne’eman, A. y Pellicano, E. (2022). Neurodiversity as politics. Human development, 66(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524277.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2006). Convención sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. ONU.
Palacios, A. (2015). El modelo social de la discapacidad. En E. Salmón y R. Bregaglio, Nueve conceptos claves para entender la Convención sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. PUCP.
Pellicano, E. y den Houting, J. (2022). Annual research review: shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381-396.
Rosqvist, H. B., Chown, N. y Stenning, A. (Eds.). (2020). Neurodiversity studies: a new critical paradigm. Routledge.
Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). ’Us’ and ’them’: the limits and possibilities of a ’politics of neurodiversity’ in neoliberal times. Disability and Society, 29(7), 1117-1129.
Savulescu, J. (2001) Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15(5-6), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00251.
Singer, J. (1999). Why can’t you be normal for once in your life? From a problem with no name to the emergence of a new category of difference. En M. Corker (Ed.), Disability discourse (pp. 59-67). Open University Press.
Thomas, C. (2004). Developing the social relational in the social model of disability: a theoretical agenda. En C. Barnes y G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: theory and research (pp. 32-47). The Disability Press.
Toro, J., Kiverstein, J. y Rietveld, E. (2020). The ecological-enactive model of disability: why disability does not entail pathological embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 537925.
Villajos, A. (18 de enero de 2024). La Constitución Española elimina el término “disminuido”. RTVE Castilla-La Mancha. https://www.rtve.es/noticias/20240118/constitucion-espanola-elimina-termino-disminuido-discapacidad-persona-con-discapacidad/15921426.shtml.
As an open access journal, access to the contents of the journal will be free of charge and the property rights are subject to a Creative Commons license. More specifically, the magazine will be licensed under the 'Attribution - Non-Commercial - No Derivative Works (by-nc-nd') license. This license allows free use of the content, but does not allow commercial use of the original work or the generation of derivative works.
